“Which is better - to have rules and agree, or to hunt and kill?”
Context: Piggy, holding the conch, challenges the tribe to choose between order and savagery shortly before his death.
Analysis
The rhetorical antithesis distils the novel's central choice into a single question, casting Piggy as the rational voice of civilisation. The pairing of "rules and agree" against "hunt and kill" frames savagery as a deliberate moral choice, not an accident. That the boys answer with violence — killing Piggy moments later — shows reason being silenced by brute force.
Language Techniques:
Exam Tip
Use to present Piggy as the embodiment of reason and democracy. His murder immediately after delivering this line dramatises the death of civilised thought on the island.